Countries largely benefit from migration As globalization increased the gap between the rich and poor countries, migration has become an urgent and debated issue to be solved. To answer the question whether migration is good for the countries or not, we have to define what this term mean. Migration means to go from one country, place or region to another. Although the inhabitants of host countries don't always realize the good aspects of migration, saying the majority of immigrants are leeches reducing the standards of living, migration has it's benefits both for the host country and for the country of origin.At first, it has a huge impact on education. Allowing permanent residence can be tempting for talented youngsters who later become quality workforce. For instance, American universities have always been the melting pot of extraordinary students: the percentage of international students enrolled at Harvard University is about twenty percents. More qualified workers products more capital.

Sacking a contractor - Essay ExampleThis essay is aimed at discussing comprehensively the stipulated procedures for undertaking dismissal of a contractor or a supplier under the following conditions, in the event that the contractor’s work is defective, where the contractors work is causing delay and in incidences where the contractor is working in a dangerous manner. Guidelines presented in this discussions will be based on the New Engineering Contract (NEC) provisions of the United Kingdom.The termination table under the NEC contract provisions details the procedure for the termination of a contract by the employer. The table provides that the employer may dismiss a contract given that the contractor has substantially failed to comply with the written obligations of the contract. Thus, defective working by the contractor could be categorized under this clause. However, NEC provides a framework for prior correction of defective processes and activities as a measure of mitigation to prevent termination of the contract.

Measuring Public Attitudes to Reality TV | Methodology1. Outline the considerations you would make in deciding between using the Thurstone, Likert or Osgood method. Highlight the particular context and conclude with a clear decision about which of the three methods you would chose.The three social research methods of attitudinal measurement are appropriate for use in this experiment as they all give statistical evidence to support the questions relating to various attitudes taken from a general consensus of people. However, each has its own merits to be considered. The Thurston, Likert and Osgood methods can give a representation of social attitudes toward Big Brother, however, which is the most ideal requires some consideration of their procedural processes. The nature of measurement and descriptive qualities in each method was considered before a test was decided and questionnaire constructed.Thurstone was one of the primary social scaling theorists.

+ Recent posts